Nazi system of corporatism

This Post is a response to

"FOURTH REICH!"

at http://mohawknationnews.com/blog/2013/11/29/fourth-reich/#comment-2523

EXCERPTS:

"MNN. Nov. 29, 2013. The banking “crime” families are the Fourth Reich. Ia’kon, we are told [and did not see it ourselves] that Jesus went to the temple in Jerusalem and found that the money-changers had turned it into a “den of thieves”. They were practicing usury, that is, charging interest on loans to people. It was immoral. He tipped their tables and exposed their debt scam to the people. A week later he was nailed to the cross."

"This Nazi system of corporatism, masked as a country, to dominate the natural people started here on Great Turtle Island. It is all funded by genocide to steal our land, resources and funds."  

RESPONSE:

Interesting article but very misleading in who are the real culprit in the Native Holocaust. Some have estimated over Hundred Million Natives where exterminated in "The 500 Year War”. This continues even today but this is not the result of "Nazi system of corporatism".


The word "Nazi" was not used by Hitler, his party or the 3rd Reich. They used the term National Socialists or NS for short. “Nazi" was a hate meme manufactured so that the Deutschen Folk would be treated as sub human savages. Since they were savages they had no rights. They could now be invaded. Tens of Millions of Deutsch where exterminated for their land, technology and patents.


More importantly the Banking System of the 3rd Reich was a threat to the USURY INTERNATIONAL BANKSTERS. Deutschland after the WW2 had the highest unemployed of all western nations. To fight this unemployment Deutschland revolutionized it’s Banking system. Instead of relying on a Debt-Usury System of the International Banksters, it spent its currency into circulation thru work projects. These work projects took 6 million unemployed and in 2 years had them employed. In National Socialism “corporatism” was at the service of the Nation and not its master as we can see in the West today.


In International Transactions the 3rd Reich, used a barter system that by passed the MONEY CHANGERS and things like using the American Petrol Dollar as a “reserve” currancy. Thru this NATIONAL SOVEREIGN Banking system, Deutschland prospered and became a leading industrial nation in the world, while countries like America where still fighting a manufactured Depression by the International Banksters.


It was not the "Nazi system of corporatism" that is responsible for the "The 500 Year War" that holocausted the Natives. The 3rd Reich was a bad example, not for Natives but for the International Banksters. Deutschland had to be destroyed and the truth needs to be continually demonized.

EXCERPTS FROM:

How Hitler Tackled Unemployment And Revived Germany’s Economy

http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html

By Mark Weber

To deal with the massive unemployment and economic paralysis of the Great Depression, both the US and German governments launched innovative and ambitious programs. Although President Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal” measures helped only marginally, the Third Reich’s much more focused and comprehensive policies proved remarkably effective. Within three years unemployment was banished and Germany’s economy was flourishing. And while Roosevelt’s record in dealing with the Depression is pretty well known, the remarkable story of how Hitler tackled the crisis is not widely understood or appreciated.

...

One of the most influential and widely read American economists of the twentieth century was John Kenneth Galbraith. He was an advisor to several presidents, and for a time served as US ambassador to India. He was the author of several dozen books, and for years taught economics at Harvard University. With regard to Germany’s record, Galbraith wrote: “… The elimination of unemployment in Germany during the Great Depression without inflation -- and with initial reliance on essential civilian activities -- was a signal accomplishment. It has rarely been praised and not much remarked. The notion that Hitler could do no good extends to his economics as it does, more plausibly, to all else.”

The Hitler regime’s economic policy, Galbraith goes on, involved “large scale borrowing for public expenditures, and at first this was principally for civilian work -- railroads, canals and the Autobahnen [highway network]. The result was a far more effective attack on unemployment than in any other industrial country.” / 1 “By late 1935,” he also wrote, “unemployment was at an end in Germany. By 1936 high income was pulling up prices or making it possible to raise them … Germany, by the late thirties, had full employment at stable prices. It was, in the industrial world, an absolutely unique achievement.” / 2 “Hitler also anticipated modern economic policy,” the economist noted, “by recognizing that a rapid approach to full employment was only possible if it was combined with wage and price controls. That a nation oppressed by economic fears would respond to Hitler as Americans did to F.D.R. is not surprising.” / 3 

...

After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American historian, Hitler and his new government “immediately launched an all-out assault on unemployment … They stimulated private industry through subsidies and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects.” / 6 

...

Jews made up about one percent of Germany’s total population when Hitler came to power. While the new government moved quickly to remove them from the nation’s political and cultural life, Jews were permitted to carry on in economic life, at least for several years. In fact, many Jews benefited from the regime’s recovery measures and the general economic revival. In June 1933, for example, Hitler approved a large-scale government investment of 14.5 million marks in the Jewish-owned firm Hertie, a Berlin department store chain. This “bail out” was done to prevent the ruin of the large firm’s suppliers, financiers, and, above all, its 14,000 employees. / 26

...

It’s often been claimed, even by some supposedly reputable scholars, that Hitler’s success in reviving his nation’s economic life was based largely on government spending for rearmament and preparation for war. This is a myth. As the renowned British historian A. J. P. Taylor noted: / 37 “Germany’s economic recovery, which was complete by 1936, did not rest on rearmamnent; it was caused mainly by lavish expenditure on public works, particularly on motor roads, and this public spending stimulated private spending also, as [British economist John Maynard] Keynes had said it would. 

...

American historian John Garraty compared the American and German responses to the Great Depression in a much-discussed article published in the American Historical Review. He wrote: / 38 “The two movements [that is, in the US and in Germany] nevertheless reacted to the Great Depression in similar ways, distinct from those of other industrial nations. Of the two the Nazis were the more successful in curing the economic ills of the 1930s. They reduced unemployment and stimulated industrial production faster than the Americans did and, considering their resources, handled their monetary and trade problems more successfully, certainly more imaginatively. This was partly because the Nazis employed deficit financing on a larger scale and partly because their totalitarian system better lent itself to the mobilization of society, both by force and by persuasion. By 1936 the depression was substantially over in Germany, far from finished in the United States.” 

...

In another major address given that same year, Hitler compared the social-political-economic systems of the United States, the Soviet Union, and Germany. / 42 “We’ve now gotten to know two [social-political] extremes,” he said. “One is that of the Capitalist states, which use lies, fraud and swindling to deny their peoples the most basic vital rights, and which are concerned entirely with their own financial interests, for which they are ready to sacrifice millions of people. On the other hand we’ve seen [in the Soviet Union] the Communist extreme: a state that’s brought unspeakable misery to millions and millions, and which, following its doctrine, sacrifices the happiness of others. From this [awareness], in my view, there is for all of us only one obligation, namely, to strive more than ever toward our national and socialist ideal … In this [German] state the prevailing principle is not, as in Soviet Russia, the principle of so-called equality, but rather only the principle of justice.” 

...